http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54426
Bug #: 54426
Summary: [4.8 Regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/common_6.f90 -O
(internal compiler error) on powerpc-apple-darwin9
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: domi...@lps.ens.fr
CC: bur...@net-b.de
Host: powerpc-apple-darwin9
Target: powerpc-apple-darwin9
Build: powerpc-apple-darwin9
On powerpc-apple-darwin9 compiling gfortran.dg/common_6.f90 gives an ICE after
revision 190710:
...
common ///g/ ! { dg-error "Syntax error" }
1
Error: Syntax error in COMMON statement at (1)
f951: internal compiler error: Bus error
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed source if appropriate.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
A reduced test is
! somme comment
common /b/x/c/ ! { dg-error "Syntax error" }
common y/d/ ! { dg-error "Syntax error" }
common /e//f/ ! { dg-error "Syntax error" }
end
where the first comment line is needed to get the ICE. The backtrace is
#0 resolve_common_vars (sym=<value temporarily unavailable, due to
optimizations>, named_common=<value temporarily unavailable, due to
optimizations>) at ../../rel_work/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:911
#1 0x0007772c in resolve_common_blocks (common_root=0x41105370) at
../../rel_work/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:960
#2 0x000889f0 in resolve_types (ns=0x4182c000) at
../../rel_work/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:14209
#3 0x0007bfc0 in gfc_resolve (ns=0x4182c000) at
../../rel_work/gcc/fortran/resolve.c:14322
#4 0x000717f8 in gfc_parse_file () at ../../rel_work/gcc/fortran/parse.c:4398
#5 0x000aeb3c in gfc_be_parse_file () at
../../rel_work/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c:191
#6 0x00589190 in compile_file () at ../../rel_work/gcc/toplev.c:546
#7 0x0058ab74 in toplev_main (argc=2, argv=0xbfffda74) at
../../rel_work/gcc/toplev.c:1863
#8 0x00002024 in start ()
If I revert the patch for gcc/fortran/match.c, the ICE goes away without
regression (full gfortran test on powerpc-apple-darwin9). I did not find the
logic for this part of the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-08/msg00180.html.
