http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54221
Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Priority|P3 |P4
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
Summary|Explicit private access |[4.8 Regression] Explicit
|specifier signals |private access specifier
|"unexpected defined but not |signals "unexpected defined
|used [-Wunused-function]" |but not used
|warning |[-Wunused-function]"
| |warning
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-21
08:53:48 UTC ---
I mark this now as regression in the Fortran front-end to keep better track of
PR middle-end/54224: It seems as if part of the fix has to be done in the
Fortran front-end.
In this PR, the issue of having a different result with PRIVATE vs. "PRIVATE ::
entry_name" is now fixed.
It remains the issue that there is no warning for unused internal procedures
(or unused nested functions in C), no warning of unused PRIVATE module
variables and a spurious warning for *used* PRIVATE module procedures. Those
are tracked in PR 54224. Additionally, there is the issue that the private
module procedures is not inlined, see other PR and PR 48636 comment 18.
