http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54301
Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Morin <mikael at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-17
16:58:54 UTC ---
As always, that's a nice to have feature, but without a thorough control
flow/value range/whatever analysis, it would either give a warning in trivial
cases only or have many false positives.
A warning for b) makes sense to me; for the others:
a) I don't see what prevents a function from returning a short lived
pointer
c) d) The pointer is globally accessible, so I'm not so sure how it could be
nullified or re-associated.
