[Bug middle-end/28831] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] Aggregate copy not elided when using a return value as a pass-by-value parameter

[chip at pobox dot com]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28831

--- Comment #18 from Chip Salzenberg <chip at pobox dot com> 2012-08-15 
18:00:39 UTC ---
What will it take to get this fixed?  Pass by value is Big in C++11 style, with
move semantics designed to tie right into the optimization that's being missed
here.

This is sucking a lot for C++.