http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54270
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-08-15 12:44:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Considering the following test case: By the way, if you compile your test case with "-O" you will see that the compiler has properly optimized away the function "s" after inlining the empty procedure body of "s" in "t". - Thus, that part of the TREE_PUBLIC() = 0 works.
