http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54249
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> 2012-08-14 11:01:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > I must also add that frankly personally I don't consider these issues so > serious: IMHO a new C++ project should immediately use the c* headers. I see > these issues mostly about legacy code. Completely agreed and therefore reducing the priority. The main reason for this bugzilla entry was not, because I need above code to be well-formed, but because there often exists uncertainty in the wild about the interpretation of the semantics of including the <*.h> headers. The issue came out of a lengthy discussion that I had about this semantics on the std-discussion group.
