http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53823
--- Comment #7 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2012-07-30 14:25:32 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > And this is why "uninitialized" warnings shouldn't be silenced like this... > > * expmed.c (expand_mult): Initialize coeff and is_neg. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=189281 Sure, considering that following is way better: # These files are to have specific diagnostics suppressed, or are not to # be subject to -Werror: # flex output may yield harmless "no previous prototype" warnings build/gengtype-lex.o-warn = -Wno-error gengtype-lex.o-warn = -Wno-error expmed.o-warn = -Wno-error
