http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54073
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2012-07-24 CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Known to work| |4.6.4 Summary|SciMark Monte Carlo test |[4.7/4.8 Regression] |performance has seriously |SciMark Monte Carlo test |decreased in recent GCC |performance has seriously |releases |decreased in recent GCC | |releases Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Known to fail| |4.7.0, 4.8.0 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-24 09:22:45 UTC --- Our autotesters have a jump of this magnitude between K8: good r171332, bad r171367 K10: good r171399, bad r171360 IA64: good r182218, bad r182265 needs further bisection, there are a few candidates within the 171399:171360 range. IA64 is supposedly sth else (the fix for PR21617 pops up here). Confirmed at least.