http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54002
--- Comment #3 from Martin von Gagern <Martin.vGagern at gmx dot net> 2012-07-18 07:09:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > See PR 52366, which makes this a dup of PR 52315 I agree that this is a duplicate of PR 52366. And although I'm still not convinced that this is really the same requirement as the one in PR 52315, I'm inclined to believe it nevertheless. Should PR 52366 be un-duped, like PR 52366 comment 4 requested out, then this here should still be duped to PR 52366 instead of PR 52315, so I suggest duping it there in the first place.
