http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52227
--- Comment #3 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> 2012-07-13 15:10:52 UTC --- Hmmm! OK - I guess that we need class_pointer/class_target/class_allocatable attributes that are retained by the symbol, rather than the container. Cheers Paul PS I have to recover the steps between the last unlimited polymorphic patch that I sent you and the present on, which does the job for unlimited OOP but breaks something such that regressions run into the hundreds. I have stared at it for a couple of evenings but cannot see what generates the problem. If I do not see it by Sunday, I'll let you take a look. On 13 July 2012 15:17, burnus at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52227 > > Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > CC| |janus at gcc dot gnu.org > > --- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-13 > 13:17:23 UTC --- > I think we need so change class.c's gfc_build_class_symbol. It currently only > handles pointer/allocatable plus a (co)rank. > > It seems to definitely lacks support for TARGET, judging by this PR, PR51610 > and PR53951. At least I fear that some wrong-code bug is lurking there if > TARGET is not properly set. > > As written in comment 0, there might be other attributes which have to be > taken > into account, e.g. VOLATILE or ASYNCHRONUOUS. > > Recall that when adding letters to the type name, either the number of allowed > characters has to change or the length part in the hashing, otherwise, names > might get cropped. > > We should try to fix this issue soonish, as it is a nasty wrong-code issue > (depending on the optimization and timing) and it affects the ABI! > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are on the CC list for the bug.
