http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899
--- Comment #3 from Neil Nelson <nnelson at infowest dot com> 2012-07-09 14:34:18 UTC --- Redi, Thank you for your very quick and detailed responses. Looks like I have some work to do on my end. I will copy this to the boost lockfree author. Neil On 07/09/2012 08:30 AM, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53899 > > --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-09 > 14:30:28 UTC --- > The lockfree code is invalid anyway because > boost::lockfree::detail::tagged_ptr > doesn't have a trivial default constructor, so it can't be used with > std::atomic >
