http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
--- Comment #9 from vincenzo Innocente <vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch>
2012-06-29 15:31:12 UTC ---
in any case the "regression" disappear if I declare inline the template methods
in question
template<typename T>
+ inline
bool
WorkerT<T>::implDoBegin(EventPrincipal& ep, EventSetup const& c,
CurrentProcessingContext const* cpc) {
etc
so I would suggest not to touch anything until is not understood If it a real
compiler bug or a "user" code mistake…
v.
On 29 Jun, 2012, at 5:03 PM, vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53780
>
> --- Comment #8 from vincenzo Innocente <vincenzo.innocente at cern dot ch>
> 2012-06-29 15:03:17 UTC ---
> NOT when applied on the top of
> gcc version 4.8.0 20120629 (experimental) [trunk revision 189073] (GCC)
> svn diff
> Index: gcc/tree.c
> ===================================================================
> --- gcc/tree.c (revision 189073)
> +++ gcc/tree.c (working copy)
> @@ -4910,7 +4910,15 @@
> fld_worklist_push (TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT (t), fld);
> /* Do not walk TYPE_NEXT_VARIANT. We do not stream it and thus
> do not and want not to reach unused variants this way. */
> - fld_worklist_push (TYPE_CONTEXT (t), fld);
> + if (TYPE_CONTEXT (t))
> + {
> + tree ctx = TYPE_CONTEXT (t);
> + /* We adjust BLOCK TYPE_CONTEXTs to the innermost non-BLOCK one.
> + So push that instead. */
> + while (ctx && TREE_CODE (ctx) == BLOCK)
> + ctx = BLOCK_SUPERCONTEXT (ctx);
> + fld_worklist_push (ctx, fld);
> + }
> /* Do not walk TYPE_CANONICAL. We do not stream it and thus do not
> and want not to reach unused types this way. */
>
> I'll try also with 4.7
>
> did not manage yet to reproduce with simple examples using sigcpp...
>
