http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53794
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |accepts-invalid
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-06-28
Summary|[c++11, accepts invalid] |[c++11] dangling reference
|dangling reference accepted |accepted in nested
|in nested structures with |structures with initializer
|initializer lists |lists
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-28
13:13:13 UTC ---
You get a warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers (or -Wextra) but it should
be rejected.
The implicity-declared default constructor for A should be defined as deleted.
[class.ctor]/5
If there is no user-declared constructor for class X, a constructor having no
parameters is implicitly declared as defaulted (8.4). [...] A defaulted default
constructor for class X is defined as deleted if:
— [...]
— any non-static data member with no brace-or-equal-initializer is of reference
type,
