http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53639
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #27606|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-06-12
10:41:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 27608
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27608
gcc48-pr53639.patch
Unfortunately that patch regressed pr49095.c testcase. So, either we limit the
splitter to the paradoxical subreg that is created by the combiner when seeing
SImode and followed by zero_extend to DImode of the result (done in this
patch), or we'd need to add new peepholes for the a = mem; a &= const; mem = a;
if (a)
cases where a &= const has been transformed into andsi_1_zext. Uros, any
preference?
