http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52967
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|libstdc++ |c++
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-04-13
00:15:05 UTC ---
I don't know if this is not undefined code.
> v[0].a = run();
Is this:
double &a = v[0].a;
a = run();
Or:
double tmp = run();
v[0].a = tmp;
I think both are correct because of the way the C++ standard defines =.