http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52628
Bug #: 52628 Summary: SH Target: Inefficient shift by T bit result Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org ReportedBy: olege...@gcc.gnu.org Target: sh*-*-* int test_01 (int a, int b, int c) { return c << (a > b ? 1 : 0); } -m4 -O2: cmp/gt r5,r4 mov r6,r0 movt r1 rts shld r1,r0 better: cmp/gt r5,r4 bf 0f add r6,r6 ! do not use shll because of T bit usage in shll 0: rts mov r6,r0 int test_02 (int a, int b, int c) { return c << (a > b ? 2 : 0); } -m4 -O2: cmp/gt r5,r4 mov r6,r0 movt r1 add r1,r1 rts shld r1,r0 better: cmp/gt r5,r4 bf 0f shll2 r6 0: rts mov r6,r0 The same goes for other shift amounts like 8 and 16. On SH4 the zero-displacement conditional branch code should be faster.