http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52620
--- Comment #2 from Akim Demaille <akim.demaille at gmail dot com> 2012-03-19 16:16:37 UTC --- (I pasted the wrong bug report, I meant http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21484) (In reply to comment #1) > template <typename T> > struct bot: med<T> > { > using top::type; > > This is not valid, med<T> is a dependent base class so name lookup never looks > in it, so top is not known to be a base class. Ah, thanks for the clarification! > If you remove that line G++ accepts the code. Ah, somehow I broke my tests. 4.6.3 does not accept it (and is the compiler I am actually using), but you are right that 4.7.0 is fine with it. > > PS/ It is extremely confusing to be submit[ted] possible "duplicates" > > that are not even C++ :( > > I assume you mean the list of possible dups when filling in the form? > Your "C++" bug might actually be a middle-end bug, or a preprocessor bug, or > something else, so it makes sense to look for dups across the whole database. Candidates were about Java :) But I understand, thanks.
