http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52453
--- Comment #2 from Allen Wu <wildpointercs at gmail dot com> 2012-03-01 16:40:07 UTC --- Thank you for your response. But I cannot see any difference between &Test::func and &(Test::func). Does C++ standard specify &(Test::func) is illegal? Thanks in advance. Allen 2012/3/2 redi at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52453 > > Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED > Resolution| |INVALID > > --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-01 > 16:34:29 UTC --- > GCC 4.2 is no longer supported, but it doesn't matter because your code is > invalid anyway. > > To take the address of a member function you must not use parentheses > around > the expression: > > pTestfunc pf = &Test::func; > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You reported the bug. >
