http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |daniel.kruegler at
| |googlemail dot com
--- Comment #1 from Daniel Krügler <daniel.kruegler at googlemail dot com>
2012-02-16 19:24:10 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Note that non-static member function pointers do not generate either issues,
> although it is necessary to add "const" to the pointer type but not to the
> corresponding function definition:
Adding const to the function type is required, because the constexpr specifier
for any non-static member functions behaves as if the function were declared as
const member function.
