http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929

--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> 2012-02-09 16:55:28 
UTC ---
Yes, I marked this PR as a regression after adding the second testcase, along
with modifying the summary.
The way it behaves in 4.6 is described in the "Tested revisions" paragraph, but
yes, I should have been more clear, sorry.

Reply via email to