http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51929
--- Comment #4 from Zdenek Sojka <zsojka at seznam dot cz> 2012-02-09 16:55:28 UTC --- Yes, I marked this PR as a regression after adding the second testcase, along with modifying the summary. The way it behaves in 4.6 is described in the "Tested revisions" paragraph, but yes, I should have been more clear, sorry.