http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52012
--- Comment #7 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com <paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com> 2012-01-31 08:23:18 UTC --- Dear Tobias, > Thanks for fixing the more pressing issue. > > (I think the other issue - second item in comment 4 - is not fixed; at least I > still get the wrong bound of "1 3". Expected: The bounds remain the same w/o > reallocation - only if realloced, they change to have lbound == 1.) I am going to check this. When the original patch was written, I did exactly as you say. However, this caused a number of regressions, where the bounds were expected to be unity based. Cheers Paul
