http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52043
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2012-01-30
CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-30
10:50:16 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183637 , but I'm
afraid I need to give up on this, I really have no idea whether it is correct
that the local_specializations is expected to be used and contain the
specializations from it even after tsubst_pack_expansion returns (but strangely
only when the saved local_specializations was NULL), or not. And thus whether
the bug is somewhere else, or whether the freeing of local_specializations for
packs should be postponed to some later spot (which one)?
