http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51988
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-25
21:35:01 UTC ---
Here is another testcase (which passes with the patch I posted but does not
with a patch which I created internally to create COND_EXPR's).
int g(int,int);
int h(int)
int f(int t, int c)
{
int d = 0;
int e = 0;
if (t)
{
d = h(c);
e = t;
}
else d = 0, e = 0;
return g(d,e);
}
