http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51988

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-25 
21:35:01 UTC ---
Here is another testcase (which passes with the patch I posted but does not
with a patch which I created internally to create COND_EXPR's).
int g(int,int);
int h(int)
int f(int t, int c)
{
  int d = 0;
  int e = 0;
  if (t)
    {
      d = h(c);
      e = t;
    }
  else d = 0, e = 0;
  return g(d,e);
}

Reply via email to