http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51916
--- Comment #10 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-23 10:11:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) > (In reply to comment #8) > > (In reply to comment #7) > > > > ... so this is a build/config issue - or, alternatively, the segment name > > can > > be specified as above since it is ignored for non-mach-o platforms. > > note: > gcc/lto/lto-object.c > hardwires this without any ill effect on other platforms. So, since the test > and the section are lto-specific, I'd suspect that this is the right solution > rather than some tricky config machinery. Yes. Can you please post it to gcc-patches@ and commit it? It's preapproved as obviously correct. Thx.
