http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51902
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #26385|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-20
10:46:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 26391
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26391
gcc47-pr51902.patch
This updated patch does that (I actually managed to implement it without
any sort of extra hash table or array). Fixes up the testcase, I wonder if I
can find a testcase where the supercontext doesn't have completely identical
range, but only tail of it (i.e. that nested block/inlined subroutine could
refer to a couple of tail elements in supercontext's range).
Mark, can you please look at this if it does the right thing you want from it?
