http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #16 from Richard Henderson <rth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-10 21:40:22 UTC --- Calls are especially problematic, yes. You've just fixed a bug for branches; hopefully that's the last of them. Though if it were a matter of preferences, I would expect that choosing a non-frame-related insn for the delay slot over a frame-related insn of otherwise equal priority would produce less heartburn in consumers even if it's possibly to handle it within gcc. You absolutely correct that we ought to have a check for this.
