http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773
--- Comment #7 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2012-01-06 15:28:16 UTC --- On Fri, 6 Jan 2012, redi at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51773 > > --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-06 > 12:08:11 UTC --- > (In reply to comment #5) > > We already discussed C++ > > semantics for those headers, see > > <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-11/msg00847.html>. > > Yep, I remember, I was just checking whether the new glibc changes altered > things - glad to hear they don't. You probably want to check all the C11 features in glibc (listed as dependencies of <http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13525> - my original list was <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2011-12/msg00051.html>) for whether the headers do what you think they should for C++ (both C++03 and C++11) - and update the glibc issues for anything needing more work for C++.
