http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51362
Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor <jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-12-07
13:03:42 UTC ---
Well, it's estimate_ipcp_clone_size_and_time that returns zero
estimated size growth. I find that quite strange, I'd never expect
the function to return that, I'd expect a new function clone to
certainly take up some space. Honza, should I handle the zero size
value or is that the bug that should be addressed?
