http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51296
--- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> 2011-11-25 15:55:36 UTC ---
> --- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-25
> 15:17:09 UTC ---
> ah so the scan-assembler test is finding the stabs info, not actually a call
> to
> the constructor
Right. I see we already have a few -g0's in constexpr.cc tests:
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/unique_ptr/cons/constexpr.cc:// { dg-options
"-std=gnu++0x -fno-inline -save-temps -g0" }
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/shared_ptr/cons/constexpr.cc:// { dg-options
"-std=gnu++0x -fno-inline -save-temps -g0" }
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/weak_ptr/cons/constexpr.cc:// { dg-options
"-std=gnu++0x -fno-inline -save-temps -g0" }
libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/enable_shared_from_this/cons/constexpr.cc:// {
dg-options "-std=gnu++0x -fno-inline -save-temps -g0" }
This was done for PR libstdc++/46869, the same issue.
Rainer
