http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51187

Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2011-11-18
                 CC|                            |ebotcazou at gcc dot
                   |                            |gnu.org
     Ever Confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-11-18 
06:31:42 UTC ---
> We discovered this bug in gcc 4.6.2 in Debian due to build failure of gcc-avr
> package on sparc (tracked in Debian as http://bugs.debian.org/648016), which
> uses gcc 4.5 source to build an AVR cross-compiler. I was not able to come up
> with a nice self-contained test-case, but here are the steps to reproduce the
> failure.

I can reproduce.  However...

> ./configure -v --enable-languages=c,c++ --prefix=/usr/lib
> --infodir=/usr/share/info --mandir=/usr/share/man --bindir=/usr/bin
> --libexecdir=/usr/lib --libdir=/usr/lib --enable-shared --with-system-zlib
> --enable-long-long --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --disable-checking
> --disable-libssp --build=sparc-linux-gnu --host=sparc-linux-gnu --target=avr

...you should never configure the compiler with --disable-checking, even in a
cross configuration.  This will save a few percents in compilation times but
disables critical internal checking; you risk silently generating wrong code.

As a matter of fact, remove this switch is a workaround for the problem.

> My analysis indicates that failure happens due to a miscompilation of
> genrecog.c by gcc 4.6.2. Here's the debugging information I posted to the
> Debian bug already (note that this was done using gcc-avr Debian source
> package, so running genrecog in pristine 4.5.3 produces slightly different
> output, but I believe that it still crashes due to same reason):

Thanks for the thorough analysis.

Reply via email to