http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50929
--- Comment #4 from Jarryd Beck <jarrydb at cse dot unsw.edu.au> 2011-10-31 10:07:04 UTC --- I didn't realise that A(A&) was a better match. I was thinking of C++ code where you might write: template <typename T> A(const T& t); A(const A& rhs); in which case A(const A&) would be chosen. I didn't realise that the rvalue reference puts a spanner in the works. I was reading the part about a template function and a non-template function being candidates, and if the non-template function is no worse than the template function then it is chosen. But I didn't realise that in this case the non-template one is actually worse. I suppose that the bug can probably be marked as invalid then.
