http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50865
--- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com <joseph at codesourcery dot com> 2011-10-25 15:52:38 UTC --- On Tue, 25 Oct 2011, jaak.randmets at cyber dot ee wrote: > > What do you think is wrong? C1X makes explicit what was intended before > > then: that both a/b and a%b have undefined behavior if the quotient is not > > representable. (See bug 30484 for more discussion; the only bug is that > > with -fwrapv this should reliably give 0.) > > In all 4 cases the quotient is representable and should evaluate to the result > of "INT64_MIN % 1". The quotient is INT64_MIN / 1, which is one greater than INT64_MAX and is not representable.
