http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50189
--- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-10-11 09:05:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > I saw the note that PR/49911 is fixed and thought that might mean this one is > fixed also. Unfortunately testing shows that is not the case, at least not in > 4_5_branch. Yes, the PR49911 case was a special case where an earlier optimization pass exposes the issue of this (PR50189) bug. That exposal is now no longer happening.
