http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40202
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez <manu at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-09-29 20:54:46 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Manuel, do you have an opinion about this rather old issue? In the meanwhile, > the warning became an hard error, when it applies. Thus the original testcase > is just accepted, and this variant: Paolo, thanks for asking my opinion! As a user, I would appreciate an extra inform saying where the variadic function is declared, like g++ does for other diagnostics. But since I don't know how hard is to get that location at the error point, and I am not volunteering to do the work... BTW, I think it is great that you are triaging and fixing so many C++ diagnostic bugs, it was sorely needed.
