http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49886

Terry Guo <terry.guo at arm dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |terry.guo at arm dot com

--- Comment #8 from Terry Guo <terry.guo at arm dot com> 2011-09-19 05:46:58 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I reverted the fix on 4.6 branch because it was causing a lot of other trouble
> (particularly PR 50295).  Therefore, this has to be re-opened.

Hi Martin,

I noticed a new dg directive was added as "/* { dg-xfail-run-if "" { "*-*-*" }
{ "-O2" "-O3" "-Os" } } */". Since then, this case is XPASS for arm-none-eabi
on QEMU for Cortex-M3. Here are the log:

Running
/home/build/work/jenkins-daily-build/src/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/dg-torture.exp
...
XPASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr49886.c  -O2  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr49886.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr49886.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-loops 
execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr49886.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -funroll-all-loops
-finline-functions  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr49886.c  -O3 -g  execution test
XPASS: gcc.dg/torture/pr49886.c  -Os  execution test

Do you think the case should fail for arm-none-eabi or not? If not, I think we
may need arm-none-eabi from dg-xfail-run-if.

Reply via email to