http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50257

--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> 2011-09-06 
09:14:40 UTC ---
Unfortunately constexpr functions are not going to help here, because of course
a call of such a function is never optimized to a constant unless *the
arguments* are all compile-time constants. In the meanwhile I timed my last
patchlet and definitely isn't worse than the other for the simple testcase we
have, otherwise I think it's much superior from any other point of view
(besides maybe readability but actually I'm using a rather common pattern),
thus for now I guess I'm going ahead with it. Thanks again.

Reply via email to