http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50288
--- Comment #11 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-09-05 15:59:45 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > I think one should also do this for class_4{a-d}.f03, where Tobias
> > apparently
> > worked around the problem by adding an extra file (just to do the cleanup).
>
> Thanks for the honor but that was Paul's patch (cf. PR 40440).
I did not check which commit it came from, I just saw your name in the file
header ;)
> The big difference is: That's a "dg-do compile" patch.
No. class_4c.f03 clearly has "dg-do run". class_4d.f03 only has "dg-do
compile", but as commented, it is only meant to do the cleanup.
I would assume this extra file for the cleanup was added to work around exactly
the problem we're discussing here.
