http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50168
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011-08-24
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-24
09:40:44 UTC ---
Hm, so the best thing we can do is a peephole recognizing that
10: 48 0f bc ff bsf %rdi,%rdi
14: 48 63 ff movslq %edi,%rdi
when rdi is zero it will stay so and the movslq is redundant?