http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49638
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-04 15:18:43 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > + if (strcmp (e1->symtree->n.sym->name, e1->symtree->n.sym->name) != 0)
>
> That can be done quicker as:
> if (e1->symtree->n.sym->name == e1->symtree->n.sym->name)
>
> well, not in the general case - but as long as "gfc_get_string" was used to
> obtain the value.
Hopefully, the above is optimized away by the c compiler.
I suspect that one of the 'e1' should be an 'e2'.
