http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49948
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-08-03
13:38:57 UTC ---
Which means it is a bug in walk_stmt_load_store_addr_ops then (and indeed
that doesn't seem to handle CONSTRUCTOR.
Well. Mine then.