http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721

--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-28 
21:31:20 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The question is we have
> 
> (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y)))
> 
> Is is OK to transform it to
> 
> (plus:DI (zero_extend:DI (FOO:SI)) (const_int Y))

It is valid if addresses can never extend across singed SI_MAX and SI_MIN.

Reply via email to