http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49866
--- Comment #1 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2011-07-27 11:46:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > This got fixed on the trunk with > http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=173797 > but for the backport it would be certainly preferrable if we got a smaller and > less riskier fix than that. The change you are referring to is fairly mechanical, so I see no problem to backport it entirely. But the backport should be handled with care, of course.
