http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49865
--- Comment #1 from sgunderson at bigfoot dot com 2011-07-27 11:38:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > Of course, the _most_ efficient code sequence here would be doing the i = 0 > before the memset, but I'm not sure if this is legal. However, eax should > still > contain zero, so the mov could be done from eax instead of from a constant. Actually, thinking about it, the most efficient code sequence would be just giving 4100 to memset instead of 4096, but that's for an enhancement request at some point.
