http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49791
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle <jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-07-22 13:49:59 UTC --- After reviewing the listread.c and the test case I see that the touched should have nothing to do with this test case since the case has nothing to do with derived types. I think the flaw is that touched should be combined with BT_DERIVED if used here at all. This leads me to believe we are missing a parenthesis around BT_DERIVED and touched and they should be ANDed in some manner.. Tobias patch is probably safe, but it may be possible to dream up a test case with derived types that will fail. (There is probably one buried in my archives but finding it would be a chore)
