http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40054
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-07-03 16:19:24 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> I think it will be very hard (if not impossible) to implement this, while
> maintaining support for statement functions at the same time. In particular,
> how is one supposed to interpret a statement like:
>
> f (x) = x + 1
>
> Is this a statement function declaration? Or rather an assignment to the
> result
> of a pointer-valued function f, which is defined further down the road? In
> many
> situations this seems to be indistinguishable (or one can only decide it at
> resolution stage, where the function f has been parsed already, if it is
> there). Or am I missing some restriction in the standard?
>
> In any case, statement functions are obsolescent since F95, so would it be an
> option to not support them with -std=f2008?
Obsolescent does not mean deleted. Unfortunately, statement functions
are still valid Fortran.
