http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49618
Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |tg at mirbsd dot org
--- Comment #1 from Thorsten Glaser <tg at mirbsd dot org> 2011-07-03 14:58:47
UTC ---
Ouch. I can see where it might be NULL… but in anal-C99 taking a pointer of
an object (&__dso_handle) can never be a NULL pointer, so GCC might, in a
very theoretical sense, be correct in optimising away this check.
Does adding -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks to the compile options help?
