http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48385
--- Comment #2 from Martin Decky <martin at decky dot cz> 2011-06-30 16:03:08 UTC --- Created attachment 24646 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24646 Initial proposed patch The attached patch works as a temporary workaround and might also hint where exactly the problem is. Now, guys, please don't crucify me for this patch. I am well aware that this patch is no more than a dirty hack and probably breaks other thinks. I present it here only to provoke some reaction from somebody who knows GCC sources well enough to propose a real solution. I have just spent some 4 hours browsing the sources, analysing relevant functions such as output_asm_insn(), ix86_print_operand(), print_reg() and similar to figure out how to change the way the tail call instruction is generated for this particular case. But I would really appreciate a little help from a senior GCC developer who not only knows what and how, but also why. Thanks in advance!
