http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49515

--- Comment #2 from Uros Bizjak <ubizjak at gmail dot com> 2011-06-24 07:42:20 
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)

> Is linker relaxation messing with this code sequence, perhaps?

You are correct. Adding -Wl,--no-relax produces correct binary.

I will open a binutils bugreport and recycle this one as a RA problem due to
extra register move.

Reply via email to