http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49022
--- Comment #24 from Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-14
13:54:13 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> It should be identical to
>
> auto&& range = v1 + v2;
> for (auto b = std::begin(range), e = std::end(range); b != e; ++b)
> { ... }
> (see 6.5.4 [stmt.ranged])
This will not work with expression template-based implementation
of valarray. The reason is that `range' may be a surrogate, and
you are likely to get rubbish addresses.
I urge people to drop range-based iteration on valarrays.
It wasn't something we were dieing for. It grew out of
someone's idea of "uniformity" that failed to appreciate
that a valarray is not your usual container.
- Gaby
