http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49363
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.06.10 12:42:03
CC| |dnovillo at gcc dot
| |gnu.org, rguenth at gcc dot
| |gnu.org, xinliangli at
| |gmail dot com
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-10
12:42:03 UTC ---
See the thread starting at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-04/msg02285.html
(continuing in May). Eventually we agreed that the user-side could be
done by a kind of function overload resolution of properly tagged functions
(proposed in http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg00150.html).
No idea if there is anybody working on it.
